Reliability and validity of the 5 categories and 72 items NOM-035 survey

Authors

  • Herman Frank Littlewood-Zimmerman
  • Jesús Felipe Uribe-Prado
  • Miguel Ángel Gurrola Rodríguez

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46443/catyp.v16i1.252

Keywords:

NOM-035, Survey, Reliabilty, Validity

Abstract

The objective is to evaluate the reliability and validity of the 5 categories and 72-item NOM-035 survey, published on October 23, 2018. Method: The questionnaire was applied to a sample of 1,247 full-time workers who work for a company that offers coffee and food in Mexico, in September and October 2019. The Results confirm that the 5 Categories comply with a minimum Cronbach's Alpha of .70, but do not meet the construct validity criteria derived from an Exploratory Factor Analysis and a Confirmatory Factor Analysis, in accordance with the requirements of numeral 7.5 of NOM-035, which must be observed by the work centers that decide to apply their own questionnaire. Limitation: This is a study that requires replication in order to confirm the results. Originality; In the literature it would be the second study that evaluates the reliability and validity of the survey. Findings: consequently, it is recommended to review the theoretical conceptualization of the Psychosocial Factors involved and the design of the questionnaire.

Portada Enero 2020

Published

2020-08-20

How to Cite

Littlewood-Zimmerman, H. F., Uribe-Prado, J. F., & Gurrola Rodríguez, M. Ángel. (2020). Reliability and validity of the 5 categories and 72 items NOM-035 survey. Ciencias Administrativas. Teoría Y Praxis, 16(1), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.46443/catyp.v16i1.252

Issue

Section

Artículos

Most read articles by the same author(s)